Which type of question requires explaining a contradiction presented in the stimulus?

The type of question that requires explaining a contradiction presented in the stimulus is indeed one that seeks to Resolve the Paradox. In these questions, the stimulus typically presents a scenario or set of facts that appear inconsistent or contradictory. The goal is to find an explanation that reconciles these conflicting pieces of information, thus clarifying the situation.

When faced with a Resolution question, the candidate must look for an answer choice that provides a logical account of how the two seemingly contradictory statements can coexist. This often involves introducing additional information or a perspective that helps make sense of both sides of the contradiction.

In contrast, the other types of questions focus on different tasks. Evaluating the Argument involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of an argument rather than reconciling contradictions. Parallel Reasoning asks for an argument that mirrors the reasoning structure of the stimulus without addressing conflicting information. Identifying the Question pertains to recognizing the type or purpose of the question asked, rather than solving a paradox.

Thus, the requirement to clarify a contradiction directly aligns with the nature of Resolve the Paradox questions, making it the appropriate answer.