What is meant by "premise-packing" in the LSAT context?

"Premise-packing" refers to the practice of including an excessive number of premises in an argument that do not collectively and adequately support the conclusion being drawn. This can lead to a lack of clarity and can make the argument seem convoluted or unfocused. In the context of the LSAT, this concept emphasizes the importance of having premises that contribute effectively to the overall argument.

When an argument is crowded with premises that fail to work together harmoniously, it can dilute the strength of the conclusion or lead to confusion regarding the main point being made. The goal of a well-structured argument is to have premises that synergistically support the conclusion, rather than a collection of ideas that may not enhance the argument's persuasiveness. Thus, recognizing "premise-packing" is crucial for understanding how arguments could be weakened or made less coherent.