What is an argument in the context of LSAT Logical Reasoning?

In the context of LSAT Logical Reasoning, an argument is characterized as a set of statements where one or more premises provide support for a conclusion. This structure is fundamental to logical reasoning because it allows us to evaluate the strength and validity of the reasoning process that leads from the premises to the conclusion.

When analyzing an argument, one examines how effectively the premises lead to the conclusion, assessing whether the evidence provided reasonably supports the assertion made. This understanding helps in dissecting the logical relationships and determining the soundness of an argument based on the evidence provided.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the definition of an argument in logical reasoning. A set of statements with no logical connection does not constitute an argument because it lacks a supporting relationship between premises and a conclusion. A statement made without supporting evidence cannot be considered an argument, as it does not attempt to provide a rationale for a conclusion. Lastly, a conclusion drawn from personal opinions does not qualify as an argument either, since this implies a subjective basis rather than a logical structure aimed at supporting a definitive claim with evidence. Thus, understanding that an argument involves premises supporting a conclusion is essential for success in analyzing LSAT questions.