What are arguments called that move from specific to general?

Prepare for the LSAT Logical Reasoning Test. Sharpen your reasoning skills with detailed questions, hints, and explanations. Ensure your success on the exam!

The correct answer is that arguments that move from specific cases to general conclusions are known as inductive arguments. Inductive reasoning involves drawing broader generalizations from specific observations or instances. For example, if you observe that the sun has risen in the east every morning of your life, you might conclude that the sun always rises in the east. This type of reasoning does not guarantee that the conclusion is true, but it does suggest that it is likely based on the evidence presented.

Inductive arguments are often characterized by their ability to make predictions and establish probabilistic outcomes rather than certainties. This distinguishes them fundamentally from deductive arguments, which start with general principles to draw specific conclusions, aiming for more certainty.

In summary, inductive arguments are crucial in reasoning as they allow for the formation of general hypotheses based on specific instances, contributing significantly to scientific inquiries and everyday decision-making processes.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy