In the example of banging my shin on a table, which part is the sufficient condition?

Prepare for the LSAT Logical Reasoning Test. Sharpen your reasoning skills with detailed questions, hints, and explanations. Ensure your success on the exam!

The sufficient condition in the context of the scenario provided is "banging my shin on the table." This is because a sufficient condition is an event or action that guarantees a particular outcome will occur. In this case, when one bangs their shin on a table, it directly leads to the sensation of pain.

To clarify, when you bang your shin, that action is enough on its own to warrant the response of feeling pain. No other circumstances are necessary for the pain to be felt; the act of banging is sufficient to produce that particular outcome.

The other options do not fulfill the criteria of a sufficient condition. Feeling pain, for instance, is the result of the action and not the condition that guarantees it. Similarly, having a table nearby may set the stage for the possibility of banging your shin, but it does not guarantee the pain outcome unless the actual action of banging occurs. Screaming in pain is a response that may come after feeling pain, thus depending on the occurrence of the pain itself. Therefore, the only option that meets the criterion of a sufficient condition is the act of banging the shin on the table.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy