How do "argument-based" questions differ from "fact-based" questions?

Argument-based questions primarily focus on evaluating reasoning and the relationships between statements, requiring the test-taker to analyze the structure and validity of arguments presented in the passage or stimulus. This type of question often involves identifying logical flaws, assessing assumptions, or drawing conclusions based on provided premises. The emphasis is on how the argument is constructed and whether it effectively supports a conclusion.

On the other hand, fact-based questions concentrate on extracting or verifying specific details and factual information presented in the text. They do not require a deep dive into the reasoning processes or logical connections; instead, they ask about what is directly stated or implied in the passage.

Understanding this distinction is critical for effectively tackling different types of questions encountered on the LSAT. Argument-based questions demand more critical thinking and reasoning skills, while fact-based questions rely on recall and comprehension of specific information. Thus, the correct choice highlights the differences in the focus of analysis required for each type of question.